Nokia 5800 XpressMusic
Similar with 5800 XpressMusic but available
Reviews about the Nokia 5800 XpressMusic
| 5 stars | 22 reviews | |
| 4 stars | 21 reviews | |
| 3 stars | 2 reviews | |
| 2 stars | 2 reviews | |
| 1 star | 0 reviews |
Give your opinion
Write your very own user opinion and let us and others know what you think about this product. Click the button to start.
Most important Nokia 5800 XpressMusic specifications
| Dimensions | 111 x 52 x 16 mm |
| Weight | 109 grams |
| Item ID | RM-365 |
| Codename | Nokia Tube |
| EAN code | 6438158190412, 6438158189768, 6417182066436, 6417182046698, 6417182042621, 5037808938308 |
| Color display | 3.2 inch, TFT |
| Camera | 3.2 MP, Carl Zeiss camera |
| Processor | 434 MHz, ARM 11 |
| Secondary camera | |
| Internal memory | 150 MB (Storage) |
| Battery | User replaceable |
| 4G (LTE) | |
Alternatives of the Nokia 5800 XpressMusic
Scroll the table below to see more
 |  |  |  |  |  |
| Current product | |||||
| Color display | 3.2 inch, TFT | 6.7 inch, Dynamic AMOLED 2X, hole-punch display | 6.2 inch, Infinity Super AMOLED Quad HD+ | 6.5 inch, Infinity-O Display, hole-punch display | 6.7 inch, Infinity Flex Display, hole-punch display |
| Camera | 3.2 MP, Carl Zeiss camera | 12 MP, 12 MP, dual camera sensor | 12.2 MP, dual camera sensor | 12 MP, 5 MP, 5 MP, 64 MP | 12 MP, 12 MP, dual camera sensor |
| Processor | 434 MHz, ARM 11 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, octa core | 1.7 GHz, 2.8 GHz, Samsung Exynos 9810, octa core | 2.0 GHz, 2.4 GHz, octa core | 2.95 GHz, Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+, octa core |
| Secondary camera | 10 MP | 8 MP | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| Internal memory | 150 MB (Storage) | 8 GB (Size (RAM)), 128 GB (Storage), 256 GB (Storage), 512 GB (Storage) | 6 GB (Size (RAM)), 256 GB (Storage), 64 GB (Storage) | 6 GB (Size (RAM)), 8 GB (Size (RAM)), 128 GB (Storage), 256 GB (Storage) | 8 GB (Size (RAM)), 256 GB (Storage) |
| Battery | User replaceable | 3700 mAh | 3500 mAh | 5000 mAh | 3300 mAh |
| 4G (LTE) |
Complete comparison between the Nokia 5800 XpressMusic and these alternatives or compare with other models